Management of proximal humerus bone loss with allograft prosthetic composite technique in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty is a difficult problem with limited treatment options. It most commonly occurs in the setting of a previously failed shoulder arthroplasty; however, it is occasionally encountered in cases of primary shoulder arthroplasty. Reconstruction of the proximal humerus is essential for soft tissue tension for implant stability and maximizing function. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes of the allograft prosthetic composite (APC) technique for the management of proximal humeral bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent primary or revision shoulder arthroplasty using an APC technique with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis for the management of proximal humerus bone loss. Data collected included demographic variables, previous shoulder surgeries, indication for APC, type of allograft utilized, fixation technique, and reoperation and revision rates. Patients were contacted by phone and/or email survey to obtain the latest patient-reported functional outcome scores. RESULTS: We identified 14 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty using the APC technique with a reverse shoulder arthroplasty prosthesis. One (7.1%) was performed as a primary arthroplasty, and 13 (92.9%) were performed as revision arthroplasties. The indications for APC were instability (21.4%), periprosthetic fracture (21.4%), periprosthetic joint infection (14.3%), humeral component loosening (14.3%), rotator cuff failure (14.3%), fracture sequelae (7.1%), and failed hemiarthroplasty (7.1%). In terms of allograft type, 10 (71.4%) were performed with proximal femur allograft and 4 (28.6%) with proximal humerus allograft. There were 6 patients (42.9%) who sustained postoperative complications, 5 patients (35.7%) had instability, and 1 (7.1%) patient had postoperative wound drainage. All patients with a complication required a revision arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: The APC technique used to address proximal humerus bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty has a high complication rate with fair patient-reported functional outcome scores. Most of the postoperative complications and reoperations are related to implant instability.

Humeral Head Avascular Necrosis: Pathophysiology, Work-up, and Treatment Options.

¼ Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is the result of ischemic injury to the epiphyseal bone leading to humeral head collapse and arthritis.¼ Common causes include trauma, chronic corticosteroid use, or systemic disease processes, such as sickle cell disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, or alcohol abuse.¼ Nonoperative treatment consists of risk factor management, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and activity modification.¼ Surgical treatment options include arthroscopic debridement, core decompression, vascularized bone grafts, and shoulder arthroplasty.

Utilization of comorbidity indices to predict discharge destination and complications following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Comorbidity indices can help identify patients at risk for postoperative complications. Purpose of this study was to compare different comorbidity indices to predict discharge destination and complications after shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Retrospective review of institutional shoulder arthroplasty database of primary anatomic (TSA) and reverse (RSA) shoulder arthroplasties. Patient demographic information was collected in order to calculate Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), age adjusted CCI (age-CCI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA). Statistical analysis performed to analyze length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, and 90-day complications. Results: There were 1365 patients included with 672 TSA and 693 RSA patients. RSA patients were older and had higher CCI, age adjusted CCI, ASA, and mFI-5 (p < 0.001). RSA patients had longer lengths of stay (LOS), more likely to have an adverse discharge (p < 0.001), and higher reoperation rate (p = 0.003). Age-CCI was most predictive of adverse discharge (AUC 0.721, 95% CI 0.704-0.768). Discussion: Patients undergoing RSA had more medical comorbidities, experienced greater LOS, higher reoperation rate, and were more likely to have an adverse discharge. Age-CCI had the best ability to predict which patients were likely to require higher-level discharge planning.

Shoulder periprosthetic joint infection is associated with increased mortality.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a catastrophic complication after shoulder arthroplasty and may be associated with an increased mortality risk, as seen in hip and knee arthroplasty. Shoulder PJI organisms differ from hip and knee infections, as lower-virulence organisms, such as Cutibacterium acnes, are more commonly encountered. This study evaluated the association between shoulder PJI and mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 411 patients who underwent revision shoulder arthroplasty from 2007 to 2020 at a single institution. 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection criteria were used to categorize each case as definite, probable, possible, or unlikely PJI. Mortality rate was assessed by performing chart reviews and an obituary search. Revision cases were grouped into a septic cohort (definite and probable PJI) and an aseptic cohort (possible and unlikely PJI). Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to compare survival between septic and aseptic groups. The log-rank test was used to compare cumulative survival distributions and survival rates at 90 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years. Demographic information, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and culture data were collected. PJI organisms were categorized as virulent or nonvirulent per an infectious disease specialist, and predictors of mortality were determined by performing stepwise logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was significantly greater (P < .001) in the septic group (20.5%) than in the aseptic group (6.6%). When evaluating time from revision surgery to death, patients with PJI had significantly greater mortality compared with those undergoing aseptic revision at 2 years (7.7% vs. 2.1%, P = .01) and 5 years (17% vs. 5.1%, P < .001). Body mass index, CCI, race, sex, and age were not significantly different between groups. Groups differed in utilization of 2-staged procedures (65% septic, 9% aseptic, P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis found that the variables most associated with mortality were septic revision, 2-staged procedures, and CCI. In the septic group, patients with C acnes PJI had a significantly lower mortality rate when compared to PJI from any other offending organism (3.1% vs. 48.4%, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Revision shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of PJI not only carries severe functional consequences for patients but is also associated with an increased mortality risk. Furthermore, C acnes infections are associated with a more favorable survival profile than PJI resulting from other organisms. Continued efforts to decrease shoulder arthroplasty infection rates are warranted and may influence long-term survival.

Diagnosis and Management of Early Complications After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become the predominant shoulder arthroplasty procedure. Despite newer design modifications, complications still occur after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Early complications include instability, acromial and scapular spine stress fractures, periprosthetic fractures, periprosthetic joint infections, and neurologic injury. It is important to discuss the diagnosis and management of these early complications.

Periprosthetic joint infections of the shoulder: A 10-year retrospective analysis outlining the heterogeneity among these patients.

Background: Diagnosis and treatment of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection is a difficult problem. The purpose of this study was to utilize the 2018 International Consensus Meeting definition of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection to categorize revision shoulder arthroplasty cases and determine variations in clinical presentation by presumed infection classification. Methods: Retrospective review of patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution. Likelihood of periprosthetic joint infection was determined based on International Consensus Meeting scoring. All patients classified as definitive or probable periprosthetic joint infection were classified as periprosthetic joint infection. All patients classified as possible or unlikely periprosthetic joint infection were classified as aseptic. The periprosthetic joint infection cohort was subsequently divided into culture-negative, non-virulent microorganism, and virulent microorganism cohorts based on culture results. Results: Four hundred and sixty cases of revision shoulder arthroplasty were reviewed. Eighty (17.4%) patients were diagnosed as definite or probable periprosthetic joint infection, of which 29 (36.3%), 39 (48.8%), and 12 (15.0%) were classified as virulent, non-virulent, or culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection, respectively. There were significant differences among periprosthetic joint infection subgroups with regard to preoperative C-reactive protein (p = 0.020), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.051), sinus tract presence (p = 0.008), and intraoperative purulence (p < 0.001). The total International Consensus Meeting criteria scores were also significantly different between the periprosthetic joint infection cohorts (p < 0.001). Discussion: While the diagnosis of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection has improved with the advent of International Consensus Meeting criteria, there remain distinct differences between periprosthetic joint infection classifications that warrant further investigation to determine the accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.

Radiographic humeral head restoration after total shoulder arthroplasty: does the stem make a difference?

BACKGROUND: Humeral stem designs for total shoulder arthroplasty have varied over the years, with a recent trend toward shorter stems. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of humeral component stem length on the ability to restore the native humeral head anatomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review including patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis between 2007 and 2017 with complete operative reports and adequate radiographs. Surgical data including stem design were collected. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements of the center of rotation (COR), humeral head height (HH), and neck-shaft angle were performed. Restoration of the native humeral anatomy was deemed "acceptable" based on postoperative differences in the COR ≤ 3 mm, HH ≤ 5 mm, and neck-shaft angle > 130°. Deviations between preoperative and postoperative measurements were compared across stem types. All available 2-year stemless implant radiographs were also analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 261 patients were included, with 31 stemless, 43 short-stem, and 187 standard-stem implants. There was no significant difference in COR restoration in the x-axis direction (P = .060) or y-axis direction (P = .579). There was no significant difference in restoration of acceptable HH by stem type (P = .339). Stemless arthroplasty implants were more likely to be placed in varus (22.6%) compared with short-stem (7.0%) and standard-stem (3.7%) designs (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Restoration of humeral anatomic parameters occurred significantly less with stemless implants than with short- and standard-stem implants. The stem of a shoulder arthroplasty implant aids surgeons in accurately restoring patient-specific anatomy.

Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Early Postsurgical Complications for Primary Coracoid Transfer Versus Revision Coracoid Transfer After Failed Prior Stabilization.

BACKGROUND: The Latarjet procedure (coracoid transfer) is often used to successfully treat failed instability procedures. However, given the reported increased complication rates in primary Latarjet surgery, there is a heightened concern for complications in performing the Latarjet procedure as revision surgery. PURPOSE: To evaluate the early outcomes and complications of the Latarjet procedure as primary surgery compared with revision surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 157 patients were included and retrospectively reviewed: 103 patients in the revision group and 54 patients in the primary group. Patients were evaluated by physical examination findings as well as by documentation of complications and reoperations extracted from their electronic medical records. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 7.8 ± 11.0 months for the primary group and 7.0 ± 13.2 months for the revision group. There were no significant differences in overall complication rates between the primary and revision groups (16.7% vs 8.7%, respectively; P = .139). The complication rate was significantly higher in patients in the revision group who had undergone a prior open procedure compared with those who had undergone only arthroscopic procedures (30.0% vs 4.1%, respectively; P < .001). Of those patients who sustained a complication, 7 of the 9 underwent a reoperation in the primary group (13.0%), and 7 of the 9 did so in the revision group (6.8%); the risk of reoperations was not different between groups (P = .198). There were 4 patients in the primary group (7.4%) and 5 patients in the revision group (4.9%) who experienced recurrent dislocations during the follow-up period (P = .513). There was no difference in postoperative range of motion. CONCLUSION: The Latarjet procedure is a reasonable option for the treatment of failed arthroscopic instability repair with an early complication rate similar to that found in primary Latarjet surgery.

Humeral-sided Radiographic Changes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize humeral-sided radiographic changes at a minimum of 2 years after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to determine their association with specific implantation techniques. METHODS: The immediate and most recent postoperative anteroposterior radiographs of 120 shoulders with primary RSA and a minimum of 2-years of radiographic follow-up were analyzed (mean follow-up 35.2 months). Stress shielding was evaluated by measuring cortical thickness at 4 different locations. Three independent examiners evaluated radiographs for humeral osteolysis, radiolucent lines, stress shielding, stem loosening, and scapular notching. RESULTS: The cortical diameter, marker of external stress shielding, significantly decreased from initial to most recent measurement (P<0.001), but did not differ between cemented and uncemented groups. Cemented stems had significantly more osteolysis and radiolucent lines; uncemented stems had significantly more internal stress shielding (P<001). The presence of scapular notching was significantly correlated with the presence of humeral osteolysis (P<0.001). Three (2.5%) stems were deemed "at risk" for loosening and 2 (1.7%) were loose. CONCLUSION: Cemented humeral stems were associated with an increased rate of radiolucent lines and osteolysis, whereas uncemented stems were associated with more internal stress shielding. Humeral cortical thickness significantly decreased over time regardless of fixation. There was an association between scapular notching and increased humeral osteolysis.

The effect of an orthopedic specialty hospital on operating room efficiency in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Operating room (OR) time is a major cost to the health care system. Therefore, increasing OR efficiency to save time may be a cost-saving tool. This study analyzed OR efficiency in shoulder arthroplasty at an orthopedic specialty hospital (OSH) and a tertiary referral center (TRC). METHODS: All primary shoulder arthroplasties performed at our OSH and TRC were identified (2013-2015). Manually matched cohorts from the OSH and TRC were compared for OR times. Three times (minutes) were recorded: anesthesia preparation time (APT; patient in room to skin incision), surgical time (ST; skin incision to skin closed), conclusion time (CT; skin closed to patient out of room). RESULTS: There were 136 primary shoulder arthroplasties performed at the OSH and matched with 136 at the TRC. OSH and TRC patients were similar in age (P = .95), body mass index (P = .97), Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 1.000), sex (P = 1.000), procedure (P = 1.000), insurance status (P = .714), discharge destination (P = .287), and diagnoses (P = .354). These matched populations had similar ST (OSH: 110.0 ± 26.6 minutes, TRC: 113.4 ± 28.7 minutes; P = .307). APT (39.2 ± 8.0 minutes) and CT (7.6 ± 3.8 minutes) were shorter in the OSH patients than APT (46.3 ± 8.8 minutes; P < .001) and CT (11.2 ± 4.7 minutes; P < .001) in TRC patients. Total nonoperative time (sum of APT and CT) at the OSH (46.8 ± 8.9 minutes) was shorter than at the TRC (57.5 ± 10.4 minutes; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar patient populations and case complexity, the OR efficiency at an OSH was superior to a TRC. Further analysis is needed to determine the financial implications of this superior OR efficiency.

Geographic Trends in the Orthopedic Surgery Residency Match.

BACKGROUND: Residency program location may be an important factor for orthopedic surgery residency applicants. More than half of residents locate their practice near the site of their training, and surgical specialties (eg, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, and general surgery) have shown geographic patterns in their residency matches. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed geographic trends in the orthopedic surgery Match. METHODS: Hometown, undergraduate institution, and medical school "preresidency locations" of all allopathic, nonmilitary, orthopedic surgery residents were recorded from program websites for the 2015-2016 academic year. Program and preresidency locations were coded according to state and US census division. Statistical analysis was used to investigate associations between residency program locations and preresidency locations. RESULTS: Of 2662 residents in the study, 1220 of 2614 (47%), 536 of 1329 (40%), and 308 of 744 (41%) matched into the same division as their medical school, undergraduate institution, and hometown, respectively. There were significant differences among divisions (P < .001). Also, 817 of 2662 (31%), 319 of 1329 (24%), and 200 of 770 (26%) residents matched in the same state as their medical school, undergraduate institution, and hometown, respectively, with significant differences between states for medical school (P < .0001) and undergraduate institution (P < .0001), but not hometown (P = .22). Overall, 21% of residents (538 of 2612) matched at the program affiliated with their medical school. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association among hometown, undergraduate institution, and medical school for the training program location in which orthopedic surgery residents match, with variability in locations matched at state and census division levels.

Treatment of periprosthetic joint infection of the elbow: 15-year experience at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) can be complicated by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with potentially catastrophic failure. The purpose of this study was to describe the results of elbow PJI treatment at a tertiary-care referral center. METHODS: An institutional TEA database was queried for infection and reoperation after TEA. Patients who underwent irrigation and débridement (I&D) with component retention were compared with those who underwent component explantation, antibiotic spacer placement, and reimplantation of a revision TEA. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients (10 men; mean age, 64.3 years) were treated for PJI of TEA. There were 3 polymicrobial infections (11.5%) and 13 Staphylococcus aureus infections (50%) (4 methicillin resistant); 6 patients (23.1%) had negative culture results. Ten patients (38.5%) underwent I&D and component retention, with 5 of those patients (5 of 10, 50%) having recurrent infection at an average of 3.1 years (range, 0.25-7.8 years) after I&D. Of 16 patients who underwent antibiotic spacer placement, 12 (75%) underwent 2-stage reimplantation of a TEA. Among those with reimplantation, 4 of 12 (33.3%) required reoperation. In 3 of 12 (25.0%), reoperation was required for infection, whereas 1 of 12 (8.3%) required surgery for mechanical complications. CONCLUSION: Two-stage revision results in a decreased rate of recurrent PJI. Certain patients (those with poor health or well-fixed components) may be more suitable for I&D and component retention, with a demonstrated 50% success rate over a period of 3 years. Longer-term follow-up may result in higher reinfection rates in both groups.

Analysis of Factors Related to the Sex Diversity of Orthopaedic Residency Programs in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Women are underrepresented as applicants to and trainees of orthopaedic surgery residencies. Factors that attract women to or deter them from orthopaedic surgery have been previously published; however, there has been no analysis of the programs that train high percentages of female residents and the factors that differentiate them from programs that have low percentages of women. The purpose of this study was to identify and compare these factors between programs with high and low percentages of female residents. METHODS: Information on each orthopaedic surgery residency program listed in the American Medical Association (AMA) Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA) was collected utilizing residency program web sites, an online survey distributed to residency program coordinators, and a follow-up telephone survey. These included data on resident and faculty demographic characteristics and residency program curriculum structure. The prevalence of factors in programs with the highest percentages of female residents was compared with those with lower percentages. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 143 (97.3%) of 147 programs, with 3,406 residents identified. Only 485 residents (14.2%) were female. Programs with more female residents had more female faculty members per program (p = 0.001), a higher percentage of faculty who were female (p < 0.001), more female associate professors (p < 0.001), more women in leadership positions (p < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of women's sports medicine programs (p = 0.03); were more commonly listed in the Top 40 for National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding (p = 0.03) and U.S. News & World Report rankings (p = 0.02); and were more likely to offer a research year (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: There are greater percentages of female residents at orthopaedic residency programs with more female faculty members, more women in leadership positions, a women's sports medicine program, and the option to do a research year. Departmental and national leaders may consider these factors when efforts are undertaken to enhance the recruitment of female applicants and improve female interest in orthopaedic surgery as a specialty.

Surgeons' experience and perceived barriers with outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Recently, outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been proposed as a safe and cost-effective alternative to the inpatient setting. This study evaluated the expert shoulder surgeon's experience with and perceived barriers to outpatient TSA. METHODS: A secure web application was used to perform an online survey of 484 active American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons members. The survey assessed surgeon practice demographics, experience with TSA/outpatient TSA, and perceived barriers to successful outpatient TSA. Simple descriptive statistics were performed to analyze the cohort. To identify differences between surgeons performing and not performing outpatient TSA, the Student t test and χ2 test were used in bivariate analysis. P < .05 was used for statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the 179 (37.0%) complete responses received, 20.7% perform outpatient TSA; of those, 78.4% reported an "excellent" experience. Outpatient surgeons were more likely to reside in the southern United States (P = .05) and performed a higher volume of TSAs annually (P = .03). Surgeons not performing outpatient TSA were more concerned with the potential of medical complications (P = .04). Perceived lack of experience (P = .002), low volume (P = .008), insurance contracts (P = .003), and reimbursement (P = .04) were less important barriers compared with outpatient TSA surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 25% of shoulder surgeons who completed survey are performing outpatient TSA, and those that do report an overall excellent experience. Volume of TSAs performed and practice location appear to play roles in the decision to perform outpatient TSA. As surgeons become more comfortable with outpatient TSA, there is a shift from concerns about medical complications to concerns about reimbursement.

Outcomes of an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a contralateral reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: It is common for patients to require staged bilateral shoulder arthroplasties. There is a unique cohort of patients who require an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and a contralateral reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study compared the outcomes of patients with a TSA in 1 shoulder and an RSA in the contralateral shoulder. METHODS: Our institutional database was queried to identify all patients with a TSA and a contralateral RSA. Data collection included patient demographics, preoperative and latest follow-up shoulder range of motion, radiographic analysis, and postoperative complications. Identified patients were assessed at follow-up visits or contacted by phone for functional outcome scores. RESULTS: Nineteen patients met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. There was statistically significant greater internal rotation in the TSA shoulder (P= .044) but no significant difference in forward elevation (P = .573) or external rotation (P= .368). There was no radiographic evidence of humeral or glenoid component loosening of any arthroplasty implants. There were no significant differences between TSA and RSA shoulders for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment (P= .381), Simple Shoulder Test (P = .352), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (P = .709), and visual analog scale satisfaction (P= .448) or pain scores (P= .305). Thirteen patients (68.4%) preferred the RSA side, 1 patient (5.3%; z = 4.04, P < .001) patient preferred the TSA side, and 5 patients expressed no preference. CONCLUSION: Despite known limitations and differences between TSA and RSA designs, patients who have received both implants are highly satisfied with both. The only parameter in which the TSA had superior outcomes was internal rotation.

The effectiveness of cerebral oxygenation monitoring during arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the beach chair position: a randomized blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Beach chair positioning for shoulder surgery is associated with measurable cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) in up to 80% of patients. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology allows real-time measurement of cerebral oxygenation and may minimize the frequency of CDEs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of CDEs when anesthetists were aware of and blinded to NIRS monitoring and to determine the short-term cognitive effects of surgery in the beach chair position. METHODS: NIRS was used to monitor cerebral oxygenation saturation in 41 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. Patients were randomized to 2 groups, anesthetists aware of or blinded to NIRS data. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to assess cognitive function preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Overall, 7 (17.5%) patients experienced a CDE, 5 (25%) in the aware group and 2 (10%) in the blinded group. There was no significant difference in MoCA scores between the aware and blinded groups preoperatively (27.9.1 vs. 28.2; P = .436), immediately postoperatively (26.1 vs. 26.2; P = .778), 2 weeks postoperatively (28.0 vs. 28.1; P = .737), or 6 weeks postoperatively (28.5 vs. 28.4; P = .779). There was a correlation of NIRS with systolic blood pressure (r = 0.448), diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.708), and mean arterial pressure (r = 0.608). CONCLUSION: In our series, the incidence of CDEs was much lower than previously reported and was not lowered by use of NIRS. Patients did not have significant cognitive deficits after arthroscopic surgery in the beach chair position, and there was a correlation between NIRS and intraoperative brachial blood pressure.

Stemless Prosthesis for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

The fourth generation of humeral components currently are being used in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty implants have evolved to better re-create anatomy, improve fixation, preserve bone, and facilitate revision surgery. Most of the design changes for shoulder arthroplasty implants have centered on the humeral stem, with a transition to shorter, metaphyseal humeral stems. Many of these humeral component design changes may be beneficial; however, long-term studies are necessary to determine if the results of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with the use of newer humeral components can match those of older humeral components.

Glenohumeral Arthritis in Young Patients: Scope, Arthroplasty, Interposition, Arthrodesis, and Resurfacing.

The management of glenohumeral arthritis in young patients is a challenge given the higher demand for use of the arms, need for longer implant survivorship, and higher postoperative expectations in this patient population. Shoulder arthroplasty is an excellent treatment option for elderly patients with glenohumeral arthritis because this patient population does not have demands as high as those of younger patients with glenohumeral arthritis. Common causes of glenohumeral arthritis in young patients include chondrolysis, inflammatory arthropathies, chronic instability, osteonecrosis, glenoid dysplasia, and early-onset osteoarthritis. Options for the surgical management of glenohumeral arthritis in young patients include arthroscopic débridement with or without capsular release, biceps tenodesis, chondroplasty, and/or subacromial decompression; soft-tissue resurfacing; humeral head resurfacing; anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; and glenohumeral arthrodesis. Shoulder arthroplasty is the preferred treatment for young patients with glenohumeral arthritis; however, surgeons must counsel patients on treatment options, surgical goals, postoperative functional expectations, and the potential for future surgery to increase the likelihood of good outcomes.

Management of Failed Rotator Cuff Repair in Young Patients.

Management of failed rotator cuff repair may be very difficult, especially in young patients. Various nonmodifiable and modifiable patient factors, including age, tendon quality, rotator cuff tear characteristics, acute or chronic rotator cuff tear, bone quality, tobacco use, and medications, affect rotator cuff repair healing. Surgical variables, such as the technique, timing, tension on the repair, the biomechanical construct, and fixation, as well as the postoperative rehabilitation strategy also affect rotator cuff repair healing. Variable outcomes have been reported in patients who undergo revision rotator cuff repair; however, a systematic surgical approach may increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. Numerous cellular and mechanical biologic augments, including platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin matrix, mesenchymal stem cells, and acellular dermal matrix grafts, have been used in rotator cuff repair; however, conflicting or inconclusive outcomes have been reported in patients who undergo revision rotator cuff repair with the use of these augments. A variety of tendon transfer options, including latissimus dorsi, teres major, lower trapezius, pectoralis minor, pectoralis major, combined pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi, and combined latissimus dorsi and teres major, are available for the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Ultimately, the optimization of surgical techniques and the use of appropriate biologic/tendon transfer techniques, if indicated, is the best method for the management of failed rotator cuff repair.

Management of Failed Rotator Cuff Repair in Young Patients.

Management of failed rotator cuff repair may be difficult, especially in young patients. Various nonmodifiable and modifiable patient factors, including age, tendon quality, rotator cuff tear characteristics, acute or chronic rotator cuff tear, bone quality, tobacco use, and medications, affect rotator cuff repair healing. Surgical variables, such as the technique, timing, tension on the repair, the biomechanical construct, and fixation, as well as the postoperative rehabilitation strategy also affect rotator cuff repair healing. Variable outcomes have been reported in patients who undergo revision rotator cuff repair; however, a systematic surgical approach may increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. Numerous cellular and mechanical biologic augments, including platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin matrix, mesenchymal stem cells, and acellular dermal matrix grafts, have been used in rotator cuff repair; however, conflicting or inconclusive outcomes have been reported in patients who undergo revision rotator cuff repair with the use of these augments. A variety of tendon transfer options, including latissimus dorsi, teres major, lower trapezius, pectoralis minor, pectoralis major, combined pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi, and combined latissimus dorsi and teres major, are available for the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Ultimately, the optimization of surgical techniques and the use of appropriate biologic/tendon transfer techniques, if indicated, is the best method for the management of failed rotator cuff repair.